🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win overall, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where election day went somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president previously backed the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.