🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had originated from mediators to resume discussions with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is walking a difficult path since Iran does not want appear to be acting from a situation of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Previous Talks Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states employed their right to restore international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats asserted three times they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Tehran representatives said the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if discussions restart.

The US president last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran sought to resume discussions, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his address to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the conflict could not be settled by combat operations. He asserted the attacks started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence challenging to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Primary Resolution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the European states that had always sought to impose their demands during the talks. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the final resolution to settle conflicts, but its criteria, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will obtain a response in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the struggle of recovery and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, stays intact. The sites and gear, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the wake of this invasion."