🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year die from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within civil society groups.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Recently, international health experts issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” commented Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be reduced to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum one year after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for different infractions “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We live in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which enable relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, noting that young individuals should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which encompasses growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.